Radical Transparency Framework

Live Scoring Preview:

• Penalty Explanations:

  *"Your post scored 40% lower because:

  • Lacks primary sources (add CoinGecko screenshots)

  • 82% similar to trending_content#291"*

• Appeal System:

  • 48hr human review for disputed penalties

User Flow: How the Live Preview Works

Example: User drafting a post about RWAs (Real World Assets)

1. Input: Draft pasted into Scream AI interface

2. Real-Time Analysis:

   • 🟢 Originality: 85% (novel comparison to TradFi)

   • 🟡 EvidenceQuality: 60% (needs on-chain analytics links)

   • 🔴 Keyword Penalty: -20% ("RWA," "yield," "tokenize" overused)

3. Optimization Tips:

   *"Add Messari chart → +15% EvidenceQuality"* "Replace 'game-changing' with concrete use case → Avoid Hype Penalty"

4. Projected Score: 72 → 89 after fixes

---

⚖️ Impact on Key User Pain Points

Complaint	Scream Solution
"Why didn’t my post score?"	Penalty explanations + improvement roadmap → 73% fewer support tickets (beta data)
"Leaderboards favor whales"	Tier-based multipliers
"Rewards only text posts"	2.2x video multiplier → 55% more video contributors in Q3 trials